Insights & Progress

Current Situation and Insight:

There is growing concern and public scrutiny of the use of plastics in the establishment of trees and woods. Although plastic tree shelters and guards are effective there are significant issues and externalised costs associated with their use and management. The use of plastic shelters is not a closed loop life-cycle; significant volumes are either neglected and left on site or lost in storms, gales and floods, and in due course degrade to become microplastics lost in the wider environment. Recovering shelters for collection and subsequent recycling costs approximately 30% of establishment cost. There are very limitied options to recycle PVC tree spirals. Bioplastics are problematic because they must be recovered from site and it is thought that they behave in a similar way to microplastics and their chemical impacts are not fully understood. Furthermore, they are difficult to process and can ‘pollute’ recycling lines. Manufacturers are looking at alternative guards but a full life-cycle analysis of these products is currently being researched.

The widespread and at times unnecessary use of plastic shelters and guards in conservation, amenity, roadside and woodland situations is a challenge. Plastic tree shelters and guards should not be used in or near riparian zones where there is a significant risk that they may become detached and lost during flood and storm events.

The Forest Plastic Working Group's work is guided by the Waste Hierarchy.

‘Prevent' is most relevant to the use of plastic in woodland creation and the FPWG has issued best practice.

Reuse is difficult to achieve with tree shelters and guards whilst plastics can also only be recycled a limited number of times.

Progress to date :

.

Alternative Tree Shelters

FPWG will be creating a new up to date table for alternative tree shelters and guards to help forestry practitioners navigate the various types entering the market.